TIRADS Calculator & Report Generator

Evaluation of thyroid nodules on ultrasound using ACR's Thyroid Imaging Reporting & Data System (TI-RADS ™). The TIRADS calculator features images from ACR's atlas and is now equipped with a report generator!

TI-RADS (report)
1. How is the nodule's composition?
2. How is the nodule’s echogenicity? (Compared to the adjacent parenchyma)
3. How is the nodule's shape?
Note: Nodule's shape should be assessed on a transverse image with measurements parallel to the sound beam for height and perpendicular to the sound beam for width.
4. How are the margins?
5. Are there any additional features? Choose all that apply.
Large comet-tail artifacts = V-shaped, >1mm, in cystic components
Macrocalcifications = cause acoustic shadowing
Peripheral/rim calcifications = along margin, either complete or partial
Punctate echogenic foci = may have small comet-tail artifacts

TIRADS Score:
→ No further follow-up is needed.
→ No further follow-up is needed.
Note: Spongiform, cystic, and almost completely cystic nodules always have a TI-RADS score of 1, irrespective of their other features.
→ No further follow-up is needed.
→ FNA if ≥ 2.5cm
→ Follow-up imaging if ≥ 1.5cm (in 1, 3, and 5 years)
→ FNA if ≥ 1.5cm
→ Follow-up imaging if ≥ 1cm (in 1, 2, 3, and 5 years)
→ FNA if ≥ 1cm
→ Follow-up imaging if ≥ 0.5cm (annually up to five years)
Answer all questions to calculate the final score
Start Over

Related Calculators:

More about the TIRADS Calculator and Report Generator

The Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS ™) calculator is a structured tool designed to help clinicians assess thyroid nodule malignancy risk based on ultrasound features. Built on the American College of Radiology (ACR ®) classification, the TIRADS framework promotes standardized interpretation and reporting, improving communication among radiologists, endocrinologists, and primary care physicians. By translating ultrasound findings into a clear point-based score, the calculator supports clinical decisions about biopsy, follow-up, or observation.

Rationale and Evolution of the TIRADS System

Thyroid nodules are common, especially in iodine-sufficient regions and older populations. While most are benign, a small portion may be malignant. Before TIRADS , variability in ultrasound descriptions often led to inconsistent management. The ACR ® TIRADS system introduced a structured, point-based approach to improve consistency, reduce unnecessary biopsies, and identify clinically significant cancers early.

The model assigns points to five ultrasound features, combining them into categories that estimate malignancy risk and guide management. This approach is now widely used in radiology and endocrinology practice.

Scoring Breakdown: Key Sonographic Features

The TIRADS calculator evaluates five ultrasound characteristics, each contributing to the total score:

  • Composition (0–2 points): From purely cystic (0) to solid (2). Mixed or spongiform nodules fall between.
  • Echogenicity (0–3 points): Compares brightness to normal thyroid tissue. Markedly hypoechoic nodules carry more points.
  • Shape (0 or 3 points): Taller-than-wide nodules receive 3 points due to higher malignancy association.
  • Margins (0–3 points): Smooth margins are benign; irregular, lobulated, or extrathyroidal borders score higher.
  • Echogenic Foci (0–3 points): Includes punctate foci (microcalcifications), macrocalcifications, or rim calcifications. Microcalcifications are most concerning.

The total score determines the TIRADS ™ category:

  • TR1 (0 points): Benign – No follow-up required.
  • TR2 (≤2 points): Not suspicious – No follow-up unless clinically indicated.
  • TR3 (3 points): Mildly suspicious – Follow-up or biopsy may be considered depending on size.
  • TR4 (4–6 points): Moderately suspicious – Biopsy recommended if size threshold is met.
  • TR5 (≥7 points): Highly suspicious – Strong consideration for biopsy ≥1 cm.
CategoryTotal PointsRisk Level
TR10Benign
TR22Not Suspicious
TR33Mildly Suspicious
TR44–6Moderately Suspicious
TR57+Highly Suspicious

Each category provides biopsy and follow-up recommendations based on nodule size and malignancy risk.

Application in Clinical Workflow

Thyroid ultrasound is often the first imaging step for patients with thyroid nodules. The TIRADS calculator simplifies interpretation by providing a consistent scoring method, especially in multidisciplinary or high-volume settings. It helps clinicians quickly convert descriptive findings into evidence-based recommendations.

Still, the calculator should be used alongside clinical context, including:

  • Personal or family history of thyroid cancer
  • Radiation exposure to head or neck
  • Rapid growth or compressive symptoms
  • Abnormal thyroid function tests

Management Based on TIRADS Categories

  • TR1–TR2: Usually benign; no follow-up needed.
  • TR3: FNA if ≥2.5 cm, or ultrasound follow-up if ≥1.5 cm.
  • TR4: Biopsy if ≥1.5 cm; monitor if 1–1.5 cm.
  • TR5: Biopsy if ≥1 cm; consider follow-up for 0.5–0.9 cm nodules.

These size thresholds align with ACR ® recommendations and balance sensitivity with the avoidance of unnecessary procedures.

Clinical Applications

  • Characterizing incidental nodules detected on CT, MRI, or PET
  • Guiding FNA decisions in asymptomatic patients
  • Standardizing follow-up recommendations
  • Improving communication among referring providers

Limitations and Clinical Judgment

The TIRADS calculator supports, but does not replace, clinical judgment. Ultrasound interpretation remains operator-dependent, and some features (like margins or echogenicity) may be subjective. Patient history, molecular findings, and cytology may also influence management beyond the score itself.

Utility Across Clinical Settings

The TI-RADS calculator is useful across hospitals, outpatient centers, and teaching programs. It helps radiologists and trainees maintain consistency, supports academic discussions, and improves clarity in interdisciplinary care.

Supporting Clear Communication

Structured TIRADS-based reporting helps clinicians explain findings to patients more clearly. It provides a standardized language for communication and helps patients understand the rationale behind recommendations for monitoring or biopsy.

Summary

The TIRADS calculator is a practical tool for standardized thyroid nodule evaluation using ultrasound features. Based on the ACR ® classification, it improves consistency, communication, and evidence-based management. It should always complement, not replace, clinical judgment and individualized care.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

  • What does TIRADS stand for?
    Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System, a structured scoring method created by the ACR ® to standardize thyroid ultrasound interpretation.
  • Can I rely on the calculator alone for diagnosis?
    No. It helps estimate risk and guide management, but decisions should always include clinical history, lab results, and physician judgment.
  • Is TIRADS only used in radiology?
    While developed for radiologists, endocrinologists and primary care physicians also use it to interpret ultrasound reports and plan next steps.
  • Does every thyroid nodule need biopsy?
    Not necessarily. Most thyroid nodules are benign. TIRADS ™ helps identify which ones are more likely to need biopsy or follow-up imaging.
  • Are there limitations to TIRADS?
    Yes. Ultrasound findings can be subjective, and factors like patient history or cytology results may change management even if the TIRADS score is low.
Dr. Pooyan Khalighinejad
Reviewed by Pooyan Khalighinejad M.D.
PGY-5 Radiology Resident Physician, UT Southwestern Medical Center, USA
Read bio

2 Comments

  1. Avatar of Orla Orla says:

    Hi there,

    I just used the TI-RADS calculator for a nodule with the following charactristics:
    Nodule #1:
    – Location: left lobe (mid segment)
    – Size: 0.7 cm
    – Composition: Solid or almost completely solid
    – Echogenicity: Hypoechoic
    – Shape: Wider than tall
    – Margins: Smooth
    – Additional findings: Peripheral/rim calcifications

    And it has classed the nodule as TR 4 rather than 5.

    Really appreciate the tool 🙂

    • Avatar of Pooyan Khalighinejad M.D. Pooyan Khalighinejad M.D. says:

      Hello Orla,
      Thanks for your feedback. Based on the characteristics you listed: solid (2), hypoechoic (2), peripheral/rim calcifications (2), smooth margins (0), wider than tall (0), the total comes to 6 points, which corresponds to TR-4. Could you clarify which feature you counted that led to TR-5?

Share your thoughts

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *